Do you wonder why is astronomy a science and astrology not? You can find out and write an engaging essay. Here is the guide to critical thinking in astrology.

Analyze the astrology and rational fallacy critically

There is a disagreement between the skeptical movement and astrology. The skeptical movement called themselves scientists who criticized astrological theories and artifacts, terming them as nonscientific. Though their sentiments are based on fallacies, nothing solid to back up their argument. If you there get fallacies out of their agreements, then students can reason with soberness and make a sober decision on them.

Unfortunately, the skeptics ground their argument on abuse of authority, ignorance, ridicule, and false presumptions. You can analyze how they base their argument according to their ignorance, abuses to their authority, and more – anything that raises a baseless argument.

Out of ignorance, skeptical individuals have come up with a fallacy that astrology is not factual. From their argument, they say that the popularity of the sun sign is not evidence for making astrology true. According to their thinking, just because most people use the sun sign charts to predict their future, it is a factual field.

Skeptics look down upon astrology because of their appeal to authority. They are making baseless critics of the astrological concepts and ideas because they are fighting to remain relevant and consistent with their authority. Other scientists in different parts of the world have faced critics from their peers because they have tried siding with astrology. They resist and argue against astrology not because they have a research-based idea even doing future research

Scientists raise a concern about astrology is based on the way they defend their ideas. According to the scientist’s point of view, astrology should explain its causal mechanism with scientific evidence related to magnetic forces or gravity. Further, they argue that astrology should base its prediction on the time of inception rather than the date of birth.

Criticize the skeptical argument on the statistical evidence of astrology

Some researchers have used modern tools to help astrologers prove their claims over predictions they make with their horoscopes. The results have been amazing. There is a need to think and intensify studies to support traditional astrology critically. As a critical thinker in astrology, what will be your take on such a subject?

Gather samples of astrology hypothesis

There are ongoing arguments on the matching of astrological tests. It doesn’t mean that questioners cannot be used in astrological researches. Questioners can give reliable information if you gather all necessary quantifiable behavior and features in the charts and for evaluation. With enough data on astrology, you can study errors and artifacts in their artifacts and remove what doesn’t make sense.

There may be risks of evaluating unrelated features in the artifacts. To avoid such shortcomings, begin by assembling related artifacts and use them for your study.

Conclusion

Some students may find the content in this article contradictory to what they are taught in class. But where do Science and astrology meet? If you are skeptical about astrology, you may never find how the two can meet. To think critically on astrology needs a base. You must find areas of argument where you can now decide the route to take when criticizing or proposing the idea.

Astrologist uses scientific tools and heavenly bodies in the study. Some people use astrology charts and calendars in predicting events and individual’s personalities. Just like science, people use astrology to generate ideas and expectations. So, in what ways is astrology not scientific?

To find out more on whether it is a science or not, here is the checklist on how astrology is applied. You can use it to support your points for whether it is a science or not.

• It has a natural world focus

Astrology studies focus on the heavenly bodies. It involves studying the sun, moon, stars, among others. The study also finds out the relationship between the heavenly bodies and the earth. It evaluates how these heavenly bodies create different seasons and effects on earth.

• Astrological studies describe the natural world

Astrology is considered a science because it is grounded in scientific research. It uses the heavenly bodies’ positions and pertains to make predictions. It also applies studies on the heavenly bodies to predict an individual’s personality and behavior. People can observe the seasons in which individual was born to determine their profession, traits and other outcomes in their life. For instance, some people think that individuals born in equinox are likely to become entrepreneurs.

• Astrology depends on the tested ideas

The astrologer is carrying out several tests and observations on an event or a phenomenon. However, the findings do not validate the idea under experiment. Just like any science field, observations are made from several experiments.

In science, an idea that turns out wrong after an experiment may be adjusted or changed. Astrology is different. Wrong results may not cause a change in the idea under observation.

• It does not involve scientific panelists or community

The finding of astrology does not need a scientific panel. In science, the findings are presented in a forum where your idea and outcomes are subjected to evaluation and discussion before publication. The astrologer may decide to write an article and publish it without subjecting the idea and finding it to a scientific community.

• Contribution to the growing body of knowledge

Astrology studies have failed to contribute to the growing field of research. Up to date, no documentation of astrological researchers is contributing to the field’s body of knowledge.

• Researchers uphold scientific methods to their study

Scientists do not wait for others to generate an idea or study for them. They think critically and create a unique idea which they subject to argument and discussions. Astrologers differ from scientists. They rarely generate ideas that are fairly subjected to thorough research before accepting them. The astrological community doesn’t accept an idea that seems to contradict others.

Conclusion

Do you think there is simplified scientific astrology? Science doesn’t support relativity. It is either wrong or correct. You can use the above points to evaluate how astrology is fake when supporting your idea.

Though those practicing astrology believe they are doing a lot of science, the scientific community feels that their innovations lack scientific backups. According to the scientific community, astrologers works within their premise. Researchers at the International Society for astrological research works with casual mechanisms, credulity effect, and the celestial body influence to study and explain astrological principles.

The assumptions of causal mechanisms

Augments to support the removal of astrology from the scientific fields are that it does not provide the causal mechanism for the terrestrial bodies under study. There are claims that astrology does not explain a clear mechanism for preferable electromagnetism and classical gravity. There should be an explanation for the relationship between the cause and effects of electromagnetism or classical gravity on terrestrial bodies and individuals. Though a causal model is not necessary to evaluate a consistent scientific pattern or behavior, astrology does not use this type of model. Astrology uses symmetries in their study. According to astrology, there are symmetries of equinoxes, meridian, solstices, and phase positions occupying regions between the plates. Astrologers depend on this natural symmetry which defines the infinite mathematical planes that dividing the space.

In astrology, there are many various conventions where human is at the center of the universe. In this case, an individual may be an animal, a ship, physical building, nun-physical things such as events, ideas, etc. it also assumes that the universe is as many as the individuals. The astrologers use this relativism in creating a natal chart. People may view it as not scientific, by it has its consequences.

The assumption on the celestial body influence

Astrology traditional believes in power within the heavenly bodies that bring changes in events and individuals. When looking at the term influences literally, it means that changes are resulting from a terrestrial object. But how can this happen? It is difficult to scientifically explain how a moving object in space can change an individual’s behavior or bring about variation in events. However, many people will claim that the astrology field has evolved. There is no reliable way of measuring the claimed effects physically. Astrology takes this symmetrical process to be the center for understanding the infinite individual universes.

Materialistic identification of the property is among the distinguishing interpretation of nature by modern science. Astrology does not have such an interpretation. If it was to be applied in astrology, then we shall assume that individuals have the power to use and identify the astrological property. – the power identified concerning the celestial bodies.

The credulity effect assumption

Astrology is very individualized because it is based on the natal charts. People auguring against astrology think that there is no standard way to the interpretation of the natal chart. Its interpretations are subjective to an individual’s wisdom. The natal chart interpretation is assumed to be valid because its wisdom that the credulous individuals subjectively evaluate

It isn’t easy to rank an idea accurately according to how astrologers believe in the interpretation of the natal chart. However, according to them, the chart interpretation is standardized by sieving common opinions from a group of individuals. It is hard to depend on this type of vague interpretation. People regard an interpretation that favors their opinion.

Science does not rely on people’s opinion or interpretation of an idea .it should be clear and tested for similar results. Astrological research relies on the effect of credulity to interpret natural happenings.

Conclusion

The science of astrology signs on these three aspects within its premise of operation-The causal mechanism, credulity effect, and the celestial body influence. Though some people find it hard to relate these concepts and how they influence what they see on horoscope and artifacts.

Is astrology a pseudoscience? May say it is not a science. However, you cannot undermine its usefulness. Many people don’t care whether it is scientific or not. Provided it offers solutions to their challenges. Astrology has remained relevant even in this error of technological advancements.

It’s hard to explain scientifically

Theories under astrology are hard to prove. In science, once you have an idea or a concept, you can test and prove it. Other science communities can test and prove the same concept. In astrology, there is a belief that what is above affects what lies below. According to them, the position of the terrestrial body in the sky affects our behavior, events, and lifestyle.

Astrologers claim that our birth time affects who we become and the events we encounter later in life. There is an unknown mechanism in the sky that brings forces that control what happens to us and the events in our lives. Such complicated theories are hard to prove scientifically. It is impractical to look at the sky as a mirror that reflects your future.

They rely on the secular theory that lacks explanation

One of the reasons why a scientist can depend on the theories with few explanations or lacks complete proof. How do you believe that unknown forces from the sky control your life and the events you encounter daily. The methods used in making predictions of the future are not scientific. Normally, such ideas need further research to either accept them or ignore them. Astrologers have never agreed to work with research to build their theories or reject them. Instead, they end up either accepting it the way it is or rejecting it without further scientific studies.

For instance, if you use a sample of five astrologers to give their opinion on a birth match, you will receive varied responses. There is no standard way of concluding an astrological event.

The astrological predictions are inconsistent

If you have used an astrological application, you will realize that your results after keying in a specific search won’t match the subsequent one. It is why astrology is a pseudoscience summary. Lack of consistency in prediction is enough evidence why astrology is not a science. Science should produce similar results with the same variables under the same treatment. For instance, the horoscope tied to your Zodiac sign will vary with astrologers. The predictions of different astrologers will not be the same. Some people may even claim that they receive the same horoscope predictions, yet they have different calendars.

It lacks modern technology

The scientific theory of astrology lacks modern appeal. Astrology in the age of uncertainty is used to bring hope to the oppressed. Most people searching for horoscopes and astrological definitions of their life events are religious. The need for spirituality and religion is in astrology.

It is difficult to explain religion with science just the way it is astrology. Astrological concepts are less of science. They fit well with social and religious believes that are non –scientific.

Astrology does not offer a far prediction of an event or somebody

People like flowery descriptions of themselves. Horoscopes are ground on this aspect of human behavior. They gave descriptions that make somebody warm up for a better future. Normally the message that comes with each description is positive, assuring confidence about the future. in the time stress, astrology gives

Conclusion

Is astrology a pseudoscience? When carefully analyses the above point, you can tell whether astrology is a pseudoscience or not. But from the analysis, it has less scientific back up.